My experiences with the sense of smell

Wagg: 1-2 drops on the wrist, rubbed on neck, shirt etc. 2 sprays of old MX101: one on back of neck, one on front under shirt I was reminded why I liked the smell of MX101 so much. It's definitely not Ammo smell but probably was Neroli based, sweet and pleasant, and none of that nasty alcohol smell that seems to be there after Androtics switched to organic alcohol which by the way is making me very hesitant to buy something new until they get some odor neutral alcohol. One lady acquintance from an earlier class together gave me her phone number so we can play some sports together. One guy asked me if I was working out or losing weight (me try to lose weight????, I spend all my energy in trying to gain weight, but whatever, I am sure he meant it as a compliment) Virtually no eye contact from any women when I went out for lunch. Around 5pm some noticeable reactions from two asian women, maybe the -none has worn off but so must have the friendly pheros. What gives? I will say the Wagg

I have a feeling it was giving out good attractive vibes. This might be a good combo.

After 3-4 days of experimentation with WAGG today I decided to add a little PF and also used 3-4 sprays of Realm (Estratetraenol). It didn't feel as good as WAGG alone in the morning. WAGG alone had created nice level of sexual tension with women who are acquaintances or strangers who I see every day. With WAGG I am also seeing a consistent dose of disrespect from some colleagues, but it's okay... WAGG alone got a definite response from a girl who is never responsive to anything and won't even raise her eye to look at anyone. Although she once went crazy hair flipping when I had used PI. The reaction from WAGG was 10 hrs after application, but I could smell WAGG on my wrists (it's very tenacious and has a very musky smell, first pheromone/mix that I can actually smell). Her squirming, constantly passing very close to me, looking into my eye, pointing entire body at me, just so reminiscent of a -none reaction on ovulating woman! If only this had happened at a different

Blurb from the website: Pherone Formula V-5 (which we call "Lover") is perfect for men who want women to feel comfortable and happy in their presence. If you want to make a great impression, Formula V-5 is a perfect choice. If women sometimes find you intimidating, Formula V-5 can help. Even women who are usually shy and anxious feel more relaxed with this formula. There are lots of good reviews for it: M3boy on askmehelpdesk I agree that pheromones could help, but the ones you need are ones that make her feel sexy and relaxed. I've had a similar problem -- my girlfriend is kind of crazy and will often freak out for no known reason. At times like that she isn't very interested in sex either. I hunted around for a pheromone that would calm her down and make her feel sexy and I found V-5 (http://www.pherone.com/v5.html) from Pherone pheromones (http://www.pherone.com) which they say is supposed to make women feel happpy and sexy and relaxed, etc. In my experience it rea

Looks like someone mixed Pherlure with Liquid Trust. Probably another scam perpetrated by Pherlure owners. Take a look: http://andromagnetism.com/ Claims to include di-dehydroepiandrosterone and oxytocin in their product Andromagnetism. Now the funny thing is that the same website is also selling Pheromore products, the one which claims to have dissolved 32 mg of pheromones in 20 ml solution and selling for $45. So, this might indicate that there is a link between Pherlure (since nobody else even talks about this fictitious chemical di-dehydroepiandrosterone) and Pheromore (and maybe even Liquid Trust), unless the andromagnetism guy is just a reseller (but then why would he have a product not sold anywhere else). This pheromone business is so funny, you can count the number of honest manufacturers on one hand and still have fingers left over.

Post by DST on l-s http://www.pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?p=133049&highlight=Pherone#post133049 Nothing new from me. I ran out of V5 and haven't yet reordered. Can't decide between that and WAGG, as they're similar. I seem to get a bit less LJBF reactions with V5, but WAGG seems to be stronger in effect. For what it's worth, I think A1 is more fundamental than both (after -none, -nol, and -rone). IMHO, it's good to get a feel for what A1 does for you, how much to use, how to apply, etc. Then add a product like WAGG or V5. Another post http://www.pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?p=101153&highlight=Pherone#post101153 I used to have problems with negative social feedback (from both sexes, while wearing -none) all the time before WAGG, A1, and a product called V5.It helps to use -rone with -none, in terms of being able to project the positives of alpha (e.g., protectiveness, fatherliness) without the negatives (dangerousness, threat). The other th

\"Hormonal changes in you directly cause predictable cognitive and hormonal changes in me, through the \"magic\" of pheromones. This is interesting because it means our social environment is literally sort of a macro-brain! You and I are really part of the same social organism (a term resurrected by Bloom for popular culture in The Lucifer Principle.). So pheromones are really the equivalent of both hormones and neurotransmitters for social organisms, one of nature\'s meta-animals! Flexible little chemicals, aren\'t they? The VNO is a unique place; where naked brain cells meet the environment! No conversion of input to chemical signals is necessary, unlike when nerves in your finger are triggered by pressure to the skin. The theater of operations is very small. Once the receptors are full, occupied, and firing, few molecules can get in. The law of diminishing returns enters. So it should not be suprising that, in my recent Life on the Edge survey, the 25 responde

This thread from l-s http://www.pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7305&highlight=WAGG

This mix is such a powerhouse and so stable. It works everytime as long as I do some Nioxin cleaning at the application points. Well, it's pretty much accepted that A314 is the best -rone based product, TE gel is one of the best -none product and Dr. Dodd's PF is one of the best -nol product. Combining these three produces the most consistent reactions. It doesn't go over the top (although any one component can be increased to exaggerate that component's core effects) and is very dependable as a general enhancement which people expect from pheromones. Today used A314 (3 drops) +TE gel (1 squirt from mini-pump)+PF (5-6 dabs near face, neck) in the morning. Good playful atmosphere, feeling of being noticed more, respectful vibe etc. An asian girl kept looking in my direction many times (without averting eye contact even when I looked back) during the times she entered and exited the coffee shop even though I was sitting with another girl.

http://wwwpsy.uni-muenster.de/inst2/maiworm/pub5.html Experiment 1 clearly shows the effect of androsterone on the perception of men. The men received more positive ratings on a variety of scales. These significant effects are related to the erotic-sexual sphere but notably the men were gauged as less sexy and there was a tendency to find them less erotic. Given these test results, it appears to be problematic to use androsterone as a test control substance in conjunction with androstenol, as described in the experiments of Gustavson et al. The effect of odoriferous secretions of human underarms appears to be influenced by various factors. Analogous to the model used for animals, the effect of chemical signals, especially pheromones, is usually influenced by the reproductive status of the signal recipient as well as that of the sender. In experiment 1, it may be seen that at different periods in the menstrual cycle androsterone and androstenol had different effects. Contrary to e

http://www.pheromonetalk.com/pheromones-48532-post21.html There seems to be a widespread misconception that pheromones are mainly useful to cover up, to deceive, to get someone in bed ... when in fact they are often used (at least by many of the more experienced men and women here) to enhance aspects of ersonality/behavior/interaction, and to increase enjoyment. If personal congruency is absent, they are ineffective! If you really believe they are a cover-up or a smokescreen, why would you ever feel ethically comfortable using them? On more than one thread today I see this idea expressed, that if you're trying to get laid and need help doing so, you should use pheromones. Otherwise, if it's a "real" relationship you're after, you should avoid them. This shows a basic misunderstanding, I think - both an overestimation of their power over a target's perception and free will, and an incomplete understanding of all the more subtle effects that pheromones can yield

I don't know, but it's strange how it does what it does. Yesterday I sprayed 1 spray from a 2.5 ml atomizer on my chest right before boarding the bus. All eyes on me when I entered. Girls started shuffling in their seats. However it doesn't feel like -none at all. I am getting responses from Asian girls as well as Caucasian girls. The only thing is this mix works better (I notice more obvious reactions) in the afternoon than morning. I think that is probably due to people having a different mood after noon than in mornings when they are groggy. I wish I could let someone else test it to see if they get similar reactions, but I am in short supply and am not very sure about being able to recreate it. With the amount of my perfect working mixes that have gone into making this it will cost a hell of a lot too.

http://fragrantfripperies.com/store/index.html http://www.yousmellmarvelous.com/ Request to readers: Please let me know if there are any other trustable ones.

Today I was wearing shorts and a short sleeve shirt showing some chest hair (not very dense) and I got loads of eye contact walking around the mall. I forgot which pheromones I wore yesterday but today I was wearing nothing (I may have some residues). I think the women's reactions were more due to my dress (the way I was blatantly checked out few times). Who says women are not visual?