Skip to main content

MX101/Pheroproof : Yet to find anything that comes close

The reason I am bringing this up today is I spilled half a bottle of my MX101 that I had stashed for future use while transferring to a to-go bottle and I was thinking what else could replace that. Nothing came to mind...

Having tried many new mixes in the past year or two I am yet to find a mix/product that is as consistent and effective as MX101/Pheroproof for attraction.

Not to say that the current mixes which are getting a lot of good reviews and working for so many users are not good, but for me they still haven't exceeded what MX101 has done or shown the potential in attraction department.

Current mixes might do other things better though, as recently I have noticed that the mix developers take a slightly different approach than people used to have in the past and they are going for more symphonic and natural feeling results. The approach in MX101 was to simply produce intense attraction from women and intense camaraderie with men, natural feeling or not!

Most of the modern mixes contain a wider array of newer pheromones which were not discovered when MX101 came out, and although having these pheromones add new dimensions to the mix, it doesn't mean that the final product will do the job better.

The point of this rant being that Androtics needs to re-release MX101. I understand that Androtics wants to compensate Futurist fairly (and I agree that's a very honorable decision even though Futurist has released the formula) but really how hard is it to keep track of how many bottles of MX101 are sold and then compensate Futurist accordingly as decided in the future.

Ammo scent (the old cover of Pheroproof) is no more but the current FF20-22 scents show promise. Release it in any scent, change the MX number and let us know that it is Pheroproof. It's NOT an experimental mix any more, no matter you change the scent or not. It has proved itself time and time again for many users multiple times. So there is no need to do a blind MX test with this.

Comments