Skip to main content

JVKohl suggests wearing -none with SOE for sexual effects

It's kind of an early post from him on l-s but still...

Read post #11
http://www.pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2153

"As most of you know, context is everything when it comes to pheromones. The issue of \"conditioning\" is paramount, and you never know how any other person has been conditioned to respond to consciously perceived odors. So, when androstenone concentrations reach perceptible levels, it\'s much more likely to be a negative signal (urinous) compared to androsterone (musky). Still, you can look back through the posts and see that some people perceive androsterone to be urinous. Fortunately they are few, compared to those who can better appreciate this chemical for what it is: an indicator of reproductive fitness--immediate response from the adrenal glands, no waiting for someone to assess overall levels of androgen. That\'s probably why most guys say that women are more talkative/friendly when SoE is worn. Maybe it won\'t lead to sex unless further assessment of the \"smell\" of testosterone (e.g., androstenone) can be acheived. So, either count on the breakdown of androstenol to androstenone in SoE, or as an unadvised alternative: add a little androstenone to the SoE mix--as several people have done to get more positive \"sexual\" results. Talk is cheap when you\'re looking for sex, right guys?"

Comments