Post by Michael at Pherotalk
One is dominant in each, but it's not a 90/10 spread.On the other hand, CTTM Mix 2 is almost perfectly half and half. It's much a much simpler mix. It just has two pheromones, and that's it.
CTTM Mix 2 effects are considerably different than Instant Honesty.Instant Honesty has quite a bit of error correction to reduce the negatives of beta-Androstenol. CTTM Mix 2 has none.CTTM Mix 2, however, should be better for attraction than Instant Honesty.
I find for attraction, both simple or "raw" mixes, as well as vast, symphonic mixes, work best. That's right -- both the simply and the overly complex. The extremes.Whereas the elegant middle ground tends to work best for daily life, relationships, work, etc.Think about it. This works with personality types, too. Attraction wise, we tend to be most taken with those who are either ultra-primitive/brute, or those who immensely refined. The middle ground doesn't get your juices flowing much, unless you're looking for a good solid parent for your future children.
One is dominant in each, but it's not a 90/10 spread.On the other hand, CTTM Mix 2 is almost perfectly half and half. It's much a much simpler mix. It just has two pheromones, and that's it.
CTTM Mix 2 effects are considerably different than Instant Honesty.Instant Honesty has quite a bit of error correction to reduce the negatives of beta-Androstenol. CTTM Mix 2 has none.CTTM Mix 2, however, should be better for attraction than Instant Honesty.
I find for attraction, both simple or "raw" mixes, as well as vast, symphonic mixes, work best. That's right -- both the simply and the overly complex. The extremes.Whereas the elegant middle ground tends to work best for daily life, relationships, work, etc.Think about it. This works with personality types, too. Attraction wise, we tend to be most taken with those who are either ultra-primitive/brute, or those who immensely refined. The middle ground doesn't get your juices flowing much, unless you're looking for a good solid parent for your future children.
Comments
Post a Comment